nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spitballing IoT Security


From: bzs () TheWorld com
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 01:14:34 -0400


On October 28, 2016 at 00:07 jxh () jxh com (Jim Hickstein) wrote:
On 10/27/16 22:59, bzs () TheWorld com wrote:
What would the manufacturers' response be if this virus had instead
just shut down, possibly in some cases physically damaged the devices
or otherwise caused them to cease functioning ever again (wiped all
their software or broke their bootability), rather than just hijacked
them for a while?

A virus that kills its host (too much of the time) is not successful.

Hmm. So now we assume we are dealing with rational actors?

I suppose one can find some rational motives in bringing down Dyn but
I don't see that it's all that different from bricking half a million
(for starters) IoT devices.

Thus far the goal just seems to be mayhem.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*


Current thread: