nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spitballing IoT Security
From: Jim Hickstein <jxh () jxh com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:07:17 -0500
On 10/27/16 22:59, bzs () TheWorld com wrote:
What would the manufacturers' response be if this virus had instead just shut down, possibly in some cases physically damaged the devices or otherwise caused them to cease functioning ever again (wiped all their software or broke their bootability), rather than just hijacked them for a while?
A virus that kills its host (too much of the time) is not successful.
Current thread:
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security, (continued)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 25)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Aled Morris (Oct 25)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Bruce Curtis (Oct 25)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 25)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eliot Lear (Oct 26)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Mike Meredith (Oct 27)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Mel Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eliot Lear (Oct 28)
- RE: Spitballing IoT Security Keith Medcalf (Oct 27)
- RE: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 27)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Jim Hickstein (Oct 28)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 28)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Stephen Satchell (Oct 28)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eric S. Raymond (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Tom Beecher (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security bzs (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Ronald F. Guilmette (Oct 29)
- Re: Spitballing IoT Security Eric S. Raymond (Oct 29)