nanog mailing list archives

SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers


From: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander () telecomputing se>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 05:47:21 +0000

Hello.

Yea its a bit strange that we would need to add memory to the platform just because we upgraded the image. 
But since we were in kind of a tight spot we opted to upgrade it and then move away from the platform in that role. 

//Gustav

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: William Herrin [mailto:bill () herrin us] 
Skickat: den 3 maj 2016 22:32
Till: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander () telecomputing se>
Kopia: Eric Sabotta <esabotta () whdh com>; NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
Ämne: Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander () telecomputing se> wrote:
Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s.
For us the router was fine until we upgraded it. When we rebooted it 
after the upgrade it ran out of memory when populating 2 full feeds.
When we contacted TAC they confirmed that indeed it was a memory 
problem and that we would need to add more memory to the box.

Hi Gustav,

IMO, you should not accept that answer from the TAC. An IOS release that crashes with two 600k BGP feeds in 4 gigs of 
RAM is badly defective.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



--
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: 
<http://www.dirtside.com/>

Current thread: