nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers


From: Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 01:08:20 +0200

Blake,

On 04 May 2016, at 00:23, Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net> wrote:

Łukasz Bromirski wrote on 5/3/2016 4:13 PM:
On 03 May 2016, at 22:31, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Gustav Ulander
<gustav.ulander () telecomputing se> wrote:
Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s.

[...]

I feel like you're trying to fit some other (possible, but far fetched) scenario from where we started.

Yeah, sorry for that - saw 1001 in quote and kept that as original platform.

For 1002 with SSO off you may be fine, sure. BTW, the versions you're quoting as working were also quoted by me as the 
ones that could have been OK even on the 1001 (I know, I know).

-- 
Łukasz Bromirski
CCIE R&S/SP #15929, CCDE #2012::17, PGP Key ID: 0xFD077F6A

Current thread: