nanog mailing list archives

Re: Standards for last mile performance


From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 10:02:01 -0500

Disagreeing is okay. It wouldn't make you any less wrong though :P
On May 1, 2016 3:58 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:

No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
end up using far, far less fiber strands.


I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
forever...

Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.

Mark.



Current thread: