nanog mailing list archives
Re: Standards for last mile performance
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 10:58:24 +0200
On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:
No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power, cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also end up using far, far less fiber strands.
I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on forever... Lord knows I've been having it since 2008. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Eric Kuhnke (May 02)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)