Re: Public DNS64

[Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>]

On Mon 2016-May-30 11:45:11 +1000, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:

> In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=SpjMbeWFRt4OOphw () mail gmail com>
> , Baldur Norddahl writes:
> > Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would
> > be unstable.
>
> This is not anycast NAT64.  It is anycast DNS64 with the well known
> 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box.
>
> While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need
> to be critised for faults that don't exist with it.

Pretty sure this was in response to:

> > > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
> > > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.

...so specifically regarding the idea of a public, anycast NAT64 service, 
rather than the public DNS64 service Google is doing.

> Mark

--
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

> > Sorry time to get to sleep.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Baldur
> > Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>:
> >
> > > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
> > > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
> > > Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack () gmail com>:
> > >
> > >> For the record:
> > >>
> > >> Tim,
> > >>
> > >> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this
> > >> thread:
> > >>
> > >>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
> > >>
> > >> but I figured I'd let you know that:
> > >>
> > >>     https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
> > >>
> > >> is now available for testing.  Perhaps it will be some use.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> -Erik
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
> > >> >
> > >> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
> > >> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
> > >> >
> > >> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Tim:>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Tim:>
> > >>
> > >
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature