Re: Public DNS64

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

DNS64 is a bad solution.  It breaks DNSSEC.  The proported benefits of
DNS64 over other ways of providing IPv4 over IPv6 don't actually exist.

DS-Lite or one of the MAP encapsulation will actually be better in the
long run.

I say this as someone who has written a DNS64 implementation.

Mark

In message <CAE_ug16_y+Ww8B3vkh-V4RNgGJyGcT9GH65z7uYpf_-XuR_ReA () mail gmail com>
, Tim Durack writes:
> For the record:
>
> Tim,
>
> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread:
>
>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
>
> but I figured I'd let you know that:
>
>     https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
>
> is now available for testing.  Perhaps it will be some use.
>
> Regards,
> -Erik
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
> >
> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
> >
> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
> >
> > --
> > Tim:>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Tim:>
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org