nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers


From: Richard Hicks <richard.hicks () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:32:14 -0700

Careful with the ASR1000 and full tables at 4GB.

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/180710

I recommend adding some third party RAM to get 16GB.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Mike <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com> wrote:

Hello,

    I have an ASR1000 router with 4gb of ram. The specs say I can get '1
million routes' on it, but as far as I have been advised, a full table of
internet routes numbers more than 530k by itself, so taking 2 full tables
seems to be out of the question (?).

     I am looking to connect to a second ip transit provider and I'm
looking for any advice or strategies that would allow me to take advantage
and make good forwarding decisions while not breaking the bank on bgp
memory consumption. I simply don't understand how this would likely play
out and what memory consumption mitigation steps may be necessary here. Im
open to ideas... a pair of route reflectors? selective bgp download? static
route filter maps?

Thank you.

Mike-




Current thread: