nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST NTP servers
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:59:02 +0200
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:52:28AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote a message of 37 lines which said:
Note that they *do* have motivation to keep it working, simply because so much of their *own* gear (from gear for individual soldiers all the way to strategic bombers and aircraft carriers) wants a working GPS signal...
Yes, but they may switch it off for civilian use (by going encrypted, for instance) at any time, if it is better for *their* operations.
Current thread:
- NIST NTP servers b f (May 09)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 09)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Spencer Ryan (May 09)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Majdi S. Abbas (May 09)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Steven Miano (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Valdis . Kletnieks (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Josh Reynolds (May 10)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST NTP servers Valdis . Kletnieks (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Eygene Ryabinkin (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jean-Francois Mezei (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Tony Finch (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 09)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Ryan Harden (May 11)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jared Mauch (May 10)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 10)