nanog mailing list archives

Re: NIST NTP servers


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 03:08:16 +0000

NTP has vulnerabilities that make it generally unsuitable for provider networks. I strongly recommend getting a 
GPS-based time server. These are as cheap as $300. Here is one I use quite a bit:

http://www.amazon.com/TM1000A-GPS-Network-Time-Server/dp/B002RC3Q4Q

You’ll have a stratum 1 clock on site. Hard to beat.

 -mel

On May 9, 2016, at 8:01 PM, b f <freetexwatson () gmail com<mailto:freetexwatson () gmail com>> wrote:

Hello List,


In search of stable, disparate stratum 1 NTP sources.

Looking for anyone’s advice/experiences (good/bad/ugly/weird) using NIST’s
NTP servers per: http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

We tried using “time.nist.gov<http://time.nist.gov>” which returns varying round-robin addresses
(as the link says), but Cisco IOS resolved the FQDN and embedded the
numeric address in the “ntp server” config statement.



After letting the new server config go through a few days of update cycles,
the drift, offset and reachability stats are not anywhere as good as what
the stats for the Navy time server are - 192.5.41.41 / tock.usno.navy.mil.


I would greatly appreciate and feedback / advice, etc.


Thanks!!!


Ed


Current thread: