nanog mailing list archives

Re: NIST NTP servers


From: David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:55:42 +0000

Ed, and anyone else reading this thread, I’m curious if you’ve looked at their authenticated NTP offering which uses 
different servers:

http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/auth-ntp.cfm


We’re considering that but haven’t tried yet.

David




On 5/9/16, 11:01 PM, "NANOG on behalf of b f" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of freetexwatson () gmail com> 
wrote:

Hello List,


In search of stable, disparate stratum 1 NTP sources.

Looking for anyone’s advice/experiences (good/bad/ugly/weird) using NIST’s
NTP servers per: http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

We tried using “time.nist.gov” which returns varying round-robin addresses
(as the link says), but Cisco IOS resolved the FQDN and embedded the
numeric address in the “ntp server” config statement.



After letting the new server config go through a few days of update cycles,
the drift, offset and reachability stats are not anywhere as good as what
the stats for the Navy time server are - 192.5.41.41 / tock.usno.navy.mil.


I would greatly appreciate and feedback / advice, etc.


Thanks!!!


Ed

Current thread: