Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4

[Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dcorbe () hammerfiber com');>> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if
> > objectively that isn’t true.  Perhaps that will help speed along the
> > adoption process.
>
>
> ​do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6
> deployment on the slow-boat?​
YMMV, but the majority of my customers are ipv6. And for those customers
with ipv6, 73% of their traffic is e2e IPv6.

I agree that there are many dark corners of Santa Cruz without IPv6, but
the story is: the whales of content and eyeballs are on IPv6, and it is
cheaper (no cgn) and faster (RUM data) than the ipv4 alternative.

Does it really matter what single digit % of Alexa 1M has a AAAA?