nanog mailing list archives
RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels
From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchurch () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:25:36 -0400
Well, they have to power to push out net neutrality. This intentional blocking of tunneling customers because their crap method of geo-location can't be used and thus hinders advancement of the internet (IPv6) is something that should disallowed. Or a good candidate for class action suit. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 5:55 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels --- chuckchurch () gmail com wrote: From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchurch () gmail com> The true jerks who used HE to bypass geo-lockout probably changed to something else the next day. But we suffer still. The FCC or some other federal entity probably needs to step in. ------------------------------------------ Yeah, because the US federal government does such a great job fixing problems like this... scott
Current thread:
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels, (continued)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 13)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Baldur Norddahl (Jun 13)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Seth Mattinen (Jun 13)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Michael Brown (Jun 07)
- RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels Chuck Church (Jun 08)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Seth Mattinen (Jun 12)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels chris (Jun 12)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Seth Mattinen (Jun 12)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Donn Lasher via NANOG (Jun 15)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels chris (Jun 12)
- RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels Scott Weeks (Jun 10)
- RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels Chuck Church (Jun 10)
- Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels Chuck Church (Jun 10)