Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 4/Jul/16 16:33, Matt Hoppes wrote:

> Except that IPv4 is not exhausted. That's the doomsday message that was preached over and over. 
>
> The simple fact that there is/are IP broker exchanges now simply proves there are surplus IPs to go around. 
>
> We have an efficiency utilization issue - not an exhaustion issue. 

As a global Internet community, which is easier to do? Going around
looking for inefficiencies in holders' allocations, or getting on with
the job of deploying IPv6?

Mark.