nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:53:20 +0200
On 4/Jul/16 14:44, Matt Hoppes wrote:
I disagree. Any data center or hosting provider is going to continue to offer IPv4 lest they island themselves from subscribers who have IPv4 only - which no data center is going to do.
But that's what I said... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Christopher Morrow (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Hugo Slabbert (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Scott Morizot (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Scott Morizot (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Saku Ytti (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Spencer Ryan (Jul 02)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Keith Medcalf (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mike Hammett (Jul 02)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Keith Medcalf (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Andrews (Jul 11)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Davide Davini (Jul 11)