Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 3/Jul/16 12:01, Ruairi Carroll wrote:

> Core of the issue is that we _need_ to get an ICMP message back to the
> original "real server" who sent it. It's a non-issue in the SP space,
> but imagine if your ECMP groups were stateful in both directions...

Okay.


>  
>
> Think about it in layers, with each little piece adding up to the
> overall cost:

I understand your points - to your comment, my question is around
whether it is cheaper (for you) to just run IPv6 in lieu of IPv6 and IPv4.

Mark.