nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Richard Hesse <richard.hesse () weebly com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:02:26 -0800
Purposefully hosting an "inflammatory" site that the Russians or Chinese object to is a valid way to get your AS null routed inside those countries. Same goes for Turkey, India, Australia... Solves the DDoS and malware problem inside their borders, not yours. On Dec 25, 2015 4:43 AM, "Max Tulyev" <maxtul () netassist ua> wrote:
Come on, keep calm and wait a year: Russia and China will de-peer with all the world for their security (AKA censorship) reasons! ;) On 25.12.15 01:44, Colin Johnston wrote:see http://map.norsecorp.com We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not takeabuse reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ?Colin
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake Richard Hesse (Jan 02)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)