nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:56:41 -0500
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:27:18PM -0500, Laurent Dumont wrote:
To be honest, the fact that NTP is still something managed by volunteers and not a regulated entity (a bit like DNS) is mind boggling.
I don't see why. Look back on 30-ish years of domain registration, I think that it was far more responsibly, ethically, and professionally managed when it was handled by volunteers. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase, (continued)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Allan Liska (Dec 30)
- RE: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Emille Blanc (Dec 30)
- RE: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Allan Liska (Dec 30)
- RE: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Jeff McAdams (Dec 30)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Harlan Stenn (Dec 30)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 30)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Yury Shefer (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Royce Williams (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Royce Williams (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Harlan Stenn (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Rich Kulawiec (Dec 30)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Jad Boutros via NANOG (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Paul Gear (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Royce Williams (Dec 20)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 19)