Re: RFC6598 in AWS?

[Matthieu Michaud <matthieu () nxdomain fr>]

Hi,

I fully agree with William and it's used in AWS infrastructure (VPC
Internet GW IIRW).

Best regards,

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:04 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson
> <arlingtonalbertson () gmail com> wrote:
> > We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this
> > range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd
> experienced
> > using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS?
>
> Hi,
>
> The Carrier NAT space? The only difference between that and RFC1918
> space is that when you have an address conflict with a third party
> using 100.64.0.0/10 it is 100% entirely your fault for
> misappropriating it.
>
> Generally speaking, 100.64.0.0/10 should not be assigned to servers,
> only client machines. Assigning it to servers creates a probability of
> conflict that the space was meant to solve.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>



-- 
Matthieu MICHAUD