Re: RFC6598 in AWS?

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson
<arlingtonalbertson () gmail com> wrote:
> We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this
> range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced
> using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS?

Hi,

The Carrier NAT space? The only difference between that and RFC1918
space is that when you have an address conflict with a third party
using 100.64.0.0/10 it is 100% entirely your fault for
misappropriating it.

Generally speaking, 100.64.0.0/10 should not be assigned to servers,
only client machines. Assigning it to servers creates a probability of
conflict that the space was meant to solve.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>