nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 16:41:23 -0400
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:13:55 -0700, Matthew Kaufman said:
If you can't hang 4k customers off a switch, why does IPv6 need so many bits for the host portion?
Oh, it doesn't *need* that many. You can go ahead and run your IPv6 subnets with a /96 or /112. Just remember that will piss off any hardware that tries to do SLAAC. or a few other things.... :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Matthew Kaufman (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Baldur Norddahl (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 10)