nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networking
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:14:38 +0100
On 07/09/2015 21:23, James Downs wrote:
What do you mean when you say “software defined networking”? Do you have a particular problem or use case you are approaching?
since when was that a requirement for SDN? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: buffer bloat and packet pacing, (continued)
- Re: buffer bloat and packet pacing Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- Re: buffer bloat and packet pacing Brett Frankenberger (Sep 03)
- Software Defined Networking Rod Beck (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Jethro R Binks (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Niraj Kacha (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Narseo Vallina Rodriguez (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking John Kristoff (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Ignacio de castro (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking James Downs (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Nick Hilliard (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Mike Hammett (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Bevan Slattery (Sep 09)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Tom Hill (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Pawel Rybczyk (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Aaron C. de Bruyn (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking alvin nanog (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Rich Kulawiec (Sep 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networking John Levine (Sep 06)