nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networking
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:59:36 -0400
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:57:26 -0700, "Aaron C. de Bruyn" said:
I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to: 220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal disclaimers are null and void. 220 You also agree that I am awesome.
Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to publicly posted mail aren't null and void? Seems to me that what they're trying to say is "Sorry, we're too lame to use PGP or similar on actually sensitive e-mail"...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Software Defined Networking, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Ignacio de castro (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking James Downs (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Nick Hilliard (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Mike Hammett (Sep 07)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Bevan Slattery (Sep 09)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Tom Hill (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Pawel Rybczyk (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Aaron C. de Bruyn (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking alvin nanog (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Rich Kulawiec (Sep 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networking John Levine (Sep 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Tyler Mills (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Jared Mauch (Sep 05)