Re: IPv6 Irony.

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

Getting IPv6 to the masses without giving them the ability to get their IPv6 problems
resolved seems not like a long-tail issue so much as a really poor choice of deployment
plans.

Just my $0.02.

Owen

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 20:17 , Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher () f5 com> wrote:
>
> > Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6
> > has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today
> > Ironic.
> >
> > Oh wait..
> >
> > Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
> >
> > Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of
> > IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And
> > being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A
> > static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
> >
> > :sigh:
> Tech support websites are long tail
>
> Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in
> high traffic use cases.
>
> Sighing about edge cases in the long tail  with ipv6 ... Not sure what you
> expect.
>
> <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me
> outtages>
>
> CB