nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Uptick in spam
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:43:46 -0400
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:59:29 -0400, Peter Beckman said:
Wouldn't that be interesting -- you can't join NANOG unless your email domain publishes an SPF record with a -all rule. That would raise the bar AND prevent the kind of thing that happened this weekend.
And make a number of long-time contributors have to change their e-mail provider just to participate. Hint: There's now 4 people listed in the To/From/CC for this mail, of which 2 don't have a -all SPF record published. Oh. And there's this in the DNS as well: nanog.org. 600 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:50.31.151.74 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::10 ip4:50.31.151.73 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::9 ~all" Did you *really* want to go there?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Uptick in spam, (continued)
- RE: Uptick in spam Milt Aitken (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam John Peach (Oct 26)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Octavio Alvarez (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Geoffrey Keating (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Peter Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Hunter Fuller (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam John Levine (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam Jutta Zalud (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Colin Johnston (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam anthony kasza (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Peter Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: more FUSSPs, Uptick in spam John Levine (Oct 27)
- Re: more FUSSPs, Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)