nanog mailing list archives
Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:46:41 -0400
The unequal treatment we see here is why, so many years ago, I fought and threatened to rhsbl .mail. We've built the walled garden anyway, and now we're damned for it. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Chris Knipe <savage () savage za org> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:you might think that with all the committees, boards, badges, ... that there was an actual operator in the nanog resume building circle who would actually do something useful about the crap mail flood now into its second day.I'd actually like to go as far as to say that the same can be said about certain hosting provider's abuse departments, and RBL operators too... Yet, if ACME Nuts & Bolts with a small VPS at some random hosting provider sends ONE spam message, their servers are shutdown almost no questions asked (never mind a good number of what, hundred thousands, over a period of days) -sigh- It's amazing how 'fair' the playing field on the Internet has become. -- Regards, Chris Knipe
Current thread:
- the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Randy Bush (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Larry Sheldon (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Jared Mauch (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Chris Knipe (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Andrew Kirch (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Seth Mattinen (Oct 26)
- Re: the crap mail flood and the nanog culture Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)