nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP choice
From: "marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:24:59 +0100
Hi Matthew,Thank a lot for your answer. This help me to understand, and make more sense to me :-).
Thanks, -Marcel On 23.10.2015 18:31, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:41 AM, marcel.duregards () yahoo fr <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr> wrote:sorry for that, but the only one I've heard about switching his core IGP is Yahoo. I've no precision, and it's really interest me. I know that there had OSPF in the DC area, and ISIS in the core, and decide to switch the core from ISIS to OSPF.Wait, what? *checks memory* *checks routers* Nope. Definitely went the other way; OSPF -> IS-IS in the core.Why spend so much time/risk to switch from ISIS to OSPF, _in the core_ a not so minor impact/task ? So I could guess it's for maintain only one IGP and have standardized config. But why OSPF against ISIS ? What could be the drivers? People skills (more people know OSPF than ISIS) --> operational reason ?I'm sorry you received the wrong information, the migration was from OSPF to IS-IS, not the other way around. Thanks! Matt
Current thread:
- IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Niels Bakker (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Matthew Petach (Oct 23)
- RE: IGP choice Jameson, Daniel (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 26)
- Re: IGP choice Niels Bakker (Oct 22)
- RE: IGP choice Damien Burke (Oct 22)
- RE: IGP choice Steve Mikulasik (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Randy via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Dave Bell (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Baldur Norddahl (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 22)