nanog mailing list archives
Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:23:50 -0400
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Yeah, if it were LISP, they could probably handle IPv6.
why can't they do v6 with any other encap? the encap really doesn't matter at all to the underlying ip protocol used, or shouldn't... you decide at the entrance to the 'virtual network' that 'thingy is in virtual-network-5 and encap the packet... regardless of ip version of the thing you are encapsulating.
Current thread:
- RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture, (continued)
- RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Michael Helmeste (May 28)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 28)
- RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Michael Helmeste (May 28)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 28)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (May 30)
- Message not available
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 28)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Blair Trosper (May 28)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (May 29)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Baldur Norddahl (May 30)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (May 30)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (May 30)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Blair Trosper (May 30)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Blair Trosper (May 30)