nanog mailing list archives
RE: gmail security is a joke
From: "John Souvestre" <johns () sstar com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:18:17 -0500
I was thinking about using the last 2 digits of the year as the cost factor, but that might not scale with hardware linearly.
How about: 2 ^ (last 2 digits of year / 2) This would track per Moore's Law. John John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
Current thread:
- Re: gmail security is a joke, (continued)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Barry Shein (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke John R. Levine (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke James Downs (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Barry Shein (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Barry Shein (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke William Herrin (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Barry Shein (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Rich Kulawiec (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Barry Shein (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Peter Beckman (May 27)
- RE: gmail security is a joke John Souvestre (May 27)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Jimmy Hess (May 27)
- Password storage (was Re: gmail security is a joke) Robert Kisteleki (May 28)
- Re: Password storage (was Re: gmail security is a joke) Christopher Morrow (May 28)
- Re: Password storage (was Re: gmail security is a joke) shawn wilson (May 28)
- Re: Password storage (was Re: gmail security is a joke) Michael Thomas (May 28)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Saku Ytti (May 26)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Christopher Morrow (May 26)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Mark Andrews (May 26)
- Re: gmail security is a joke Owen DeLong (May 27)