Re: Low Cost 10G Router

[Rodrigo 1telecom <rodrigo () 1telecom com br>]

I know if is not possible to have a full routing on ex3300(low memory for it) , but i never tried to do a default 
router on it( with EFL licence and software above version 12)
I have many bgp session with cisco 3750 switchs.. Traffic about 2gb on it... Have a peer( ebgp customer) with a 
acx2000( i know it have 10gb port) we send to this router a default route only... And it have 1.5gb with us and more 
1gb with other link provider...
Enviado via iPhone 
Grupo Connectoway

> Em 19/05/2015, às 17:59, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov () gmail com> escreveu:
>
> Hello!
>
> Yep, there are no existent open source routers yet exists. But there
> are a lot of capabilities for this. We could just wait some time.
>
> But DPDK _definitely_ could process 64mpps and 40GE with deep
> inspection and processing on enough cheap E5 2670v3 chips.
>
> Yes, definitely it's ideas about good future. They can't be used now
> but they have really awesome outlook.
>
>
>
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:46 PM,  <charles () thefnf org> wrote:
> > > On 2015-05-19 14:23, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Somebody definitely should build full feature router with
> > > DPDK/netmap/pf_ring :)
> >
> >
> > Netmap yes. The rest no. Why? Because netmap supports libpcap, which means
> > everything just works. Other solutions need porting.
> > You are going along, someone mentions a neat new libpcap based tool on NANOG
> > and you want to try it out. If you've got DPDK/pf_ring, that means you are
> > now having to port it. That's a fair amount of effort to just eval
> > $COOL_NEW_TOOL.
> >
> >
> >
> > > I have finished detailed performance tests for all of them and could
> > > achieve wire speed forwarding (with simple packet rewrite and checksum
> > > calculation) with all of they.
> >
> >
> > With what features applied? DPDK with a fairly full feature set (firewall
> > rules/dynamic routing/across a vpn tunnel/doing full l7 deep packet
> > inspection) on straight commodity (something relatively recent gen xeon
> > something many cores) hardware on $CERTAIN_POPULAR_RTOS seems to max out
> > ~5gbps from what my local neighborhood network testing nerds tell me.
> >
> > As always, your mileage will most certainly vary of course. The nice thing
> > about commodity boxes is that you can just deploy the same "core kit" and
> > scale it up/down (ram/cpu/redundant psu) at your favorite vendors
> > procurement portal (oh hey $systems_purchaser , can you order a couple extra
> > boxes with that next set of a dozen boxes your buying with this SKU and take
> > it out of my budget? Thx).
> >
> > You are still going to pay a pretty decent list price for boxes that can
> > reasonably forward AND inspect/block/modify at anything approaching line
> > rate over say 5gbps. Then you have things like the parallela board of course
> > with it's FPGA. And you have CUDA cards. But staffing costs for someone who
> > has FPGA(parallel in general)/sysadmin/netadmin skills.... well that's pricy
> > (and you'll want a couple of those in house if you do this at any kind of
> > scale). Or you could just contract them I suppose (say at like $700.00 per
> > hour or so?, which is what I'd charge to be a one man FPGA coding SDN
> > slinging band since it's sort of like catching unicorns) Course you could
> > just have your jack of all trades in house sys/net ops person and contract
> > coding skills as needed.
> >
> > Don't think this will really save you money. It won't.
> >
> > Buy a Juniper. Seriously.
> >
> > (I have a 6509 in my house along with various switches/routers/wifi/voip
> > phones (all cisco). I'm not anti cisco by any means). But they are expensive
> > from what I hear. You get what you pay for though.
> >
> > What it will get you, is a very powerful and flexible solution that lets you
> > manage at hyperscale with a unified command/control plane. It's DEVOPS 2.0
> > (oooo I can fire my netadmins now like I fired my sysadmins after I gave dev
> > full prod access? COOL!) (Yes I'm being incredibly sarcastic and don't
> > actually believe that). :)
> >
> > Also look at onepk from cisco. It's kinda cool if you want SDN without
> > having to fully build your own kit.
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov