nanog mailing list archives

Re: Thousands of hosts on a gigabit LAN, maybe not


From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:02:13 -0400

Forgot to mention - you might also want to check out Beowulf clusters - there's an email list at http://www.beowulf.org/ - probably some useful info in the list archives, maybe a good place to post your query.

Miles

Miles Fidelman wrote:
John Levine wrote:
Some people I know (yes really) are building a system that will have
several thousand little computers in some racks.  Each of the
computers runs Linux and has a gigabit ethernet interface.  It occurs
to me that it is unlikely that I can buy an ethernet switch with
thousands of ports, and even if I could, would I want a Linux system
to have 10,000 entries or more in its ARP table.

Most of the traffic will be from one node to another, with
considerably less to the outside.  Physical distance shouldn't be a
problem since everything's in the same room, maybe the same rack.

What's the rule of thumb for number of hosts per switch, cascaded
switches vs. routers, and whatever else one needs to design a dense
network like this?  TIA



It's become fairly commonplace to build supercomputers out of clusters of 100s, or 1000s of commodity PCs, see, for example:
www.rocksclusters.org
http://www.rocksclusters.org/presentations/tutorial/tutorial-1.pdf
or
http://www.dodlive.mil/files/2010/12/CondorSupercomputerbrochure_101117_kb-3.pdf (a cluster of 1760 playstations at AFRL Rome Labs)

Interestingly, all the documentation I can find is heavy on the software layers used to cluster resources - but there's little about hardware configuration other than pretty pictures of racks with lots of CPUs and lots of wires.

If the people you know are trying to do something similar - it might be worth some nosing around the Rocks community, or some phone calls. I expect that interconnect architecture and latency might be a bit of an issue for this sort of application.

Miles Fidelman






--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra


Current thread: