nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:44:01 -0400
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:14:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:
I also think that trying to pack more bits of information into the numbering system is a mistake. But then, I would. I think you look those sorts of things up (in the DNS, of course ;-) )
DANE? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested, (continued)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested William Norton (Mar 14)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Rob Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Charles N Wyble (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Rob Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Harlan Stenn (Mar 15)
- Supporting network time software development/maintenance (was: Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested) Rob Seastrom (Mar 16)
- Re: Supporting network time software development/maintenance (was: Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested) Harlan Stenn (Mar 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Lee Howard (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Andrew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: BCOP appeals numbering scheme -- feedback requested Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)