nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google served from non-google IPs?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:43:32 -0400
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:32 PM, ITechGeek <itg () itechgeek com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail comwrote:I'm surprised they don't set aside a small piece of their IP space thatan 'they' and 'their' here are confusing, which 'they' and 'their' did you mean?In this case they being Google and their being Google's IP space (but you can replace Google w/ any provider using caching servers).
this has the same uncertainty problems with other folk I imagine.
When I was using Comcast 6to4 gateway, the latency wasn't too bad (I'm a Comcast customer). If the anycast is being broadcast from a regional datacenter and your ISP has good connectivity, the latency shouldn't be bad (in the QIX case above, the latency shouldn't be any worse than QIX's IPs unless someone started advertising the same anycast subnet w/ a lower cost).
there are a lot of ifs there... and failover is where the problems arise :(
Current thread:
- Google served from non-google IPs? Jason Lixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Stephen Fulton (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Trent Farrell (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Eduardo Schoedler (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Steven Schecter (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Dave Temkin (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? ITechGeek (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? ITechGeek (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Dave Temkin (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Stephen Fulton (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? manning (Mar 14)