nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google served from non-google IPs?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:09:40 -0400
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:05 PM, ITechGeek <itg () itechgeek com> wrote:
I'm surprised they don't set aside a small piece of their IP space that an
'they' and 'their' here are confusing, which 'they' and 'their' did you mean?
ISP can anycast routes locally to the cache (Maybe a /24?)
that sounds like a recipe for disaster with respect to latency and jitter and control of destination of the user request, eh? Have you tried using 6to4 gateways?
Current thread:
- Google served from non-google IPs? Jason Lixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Stephen Fulton (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Trent Farrell (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Eduardo Schoedler (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Steven Schecter (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Dave Temkin (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? ITechGeek (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? ITechGeek (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Dave Temkin (Mar 14)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? Stephen Fulton (Mar 12)
- Re: Google served from non-google IPs? manning (Mar 14)