nanog mailing list archives

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:24:59 -0400

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
For example, let’s say you have 20 machines for whom you want to allow inbound SSH access. In the IPv4 world, with 
NAT, you have to configure an individual port mapping for each machine and you have to either configure all of the 
SSH clients, or, specify the particular port for the machine you want to get to on the command line.

in the original case in question the fact that there's nat happeng
isn't material... so all of this discussion of NAT is a red herring,
right? the user of AWS services cares not that 'nat is happening',
because they can simply RESTful up a VM instance and ssh into it in
~30 seconds, no config required.

let's skip all NAT discussions on this topic from here on out, yes?


Current thread: