nanog mailing list archives

Re: Residential VSAT experiences?


From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:54:49 -0700

I never had good luck with VSAT and SIP. Maybe you had a better kit than I
did :)

-Mike


On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Dovid Bender <dovid () telecurve com> wrote:

Interesting that you say that about sip. We had a client that would use it
for sip on ships all the time. It wasn't the best but it worked. Ping times
were between 500-700ms.



Regards,

Dovid

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Sender: "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:33:43
To: Nicholas Oas<nicholas.oas () gmail com>; NANOG<nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Residential VSAT experiences?

SIP will suck. VPN will suck. RDP will suck.

Have you looked to see if you have any local wireless ISPs in your area?
Hit me up offlist if you want me to check for you.

-Mike


On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas () gmail com>
wrote:

Would anyone mind sharing with me their first-hand experiences with
residential satellite internet?

Right now I am evaluating HughesNet Gen4 and ViaSat Exede and I'm
thinking
specifically as a sysadmin who needs to use the uplink for work, not
surf.

What are your experiences with the following applications?
-SSH, (specifically interactive CLI shell access)
-RDP
-SIP over SSL
-IPSec Tunneling (should be a non-starter due to latency)
-GRE Tunneling

Thank you,

-Nicholas




--
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
mike.lyon () gmail com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon




-- 
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
mike.lyon () gmail com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon


Current thread: