nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:33:25 -0700
On 7/9/2015 3:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Can you offer one valid reason not to give residential users /48s? Any benefit whatsoever?
Sure. To avoid having to go back and deal with ARIN yet again for more IPv6 space.
One of the hopeful outcomes of IPv6 adoption was that an ISP could get enough to last "forever" in a single transaction. But "forever" isn't very long at one /48 (or more) per customer.
Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Naslund, Steve (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Laszlo Hanyecz (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 10)