nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: "Israel G. Lugo" <israel.lugo () lugosys com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 02:37:52 +0100
On 07/09/2015 02:15 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
If you’re trying to build a decent sized ISP in a /32, you’re doing it wrong. /32 is not the “standard size” — It’s the MINIMUM size.
I've addressed this and most of what you said in my earlier reply to Mike Hammet (00:57:29 UTC). I was going to reply in more detail here but I see you've replied to the other email now as well. I'll just say that I am aware of the math, and I'm not trying to "disprove IPv6" -- nor am I making the typical argument that we will run out of IPv6 addresses.
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Lyon (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 06)