nanog mailing list archives

Re: look for BGP routes containing local AS#


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:23:38 -0800

On 1/27/15 5:45 AM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,

Recently I studied the BGP AS path looping problem, and found that in
most cases, the received BGP routes containing local AS# are suspicious.
However, we checked our BGP routing table (AS23910,CERNET2) on juniper
router(show route hidden terse aspath-regex .*23910.* ), and have not
found such routes in Adj-RIB-In.

Updates with your AS in the path are discarded as part of loop
detection, e.g. they do not become candidate routes.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4271 page 77

   If the AS_PATH attribute of a BGP route contains an AS loop, the BGP
   route should be excluded from the Phase 2 decision function.  AS loop
   detection is done by scanning the full AS path (as specified in the
   AS_PATH attribute), and checking that the autonomous system number of
   the local system does not appear in the AS path.  Operations of a BGP
   speaker that is configured to accept routes with its own autonomous
   system number in the AS path are outside the scope of this document.

in junos

neighbor { ipAddress | ipv6Address | peerGroupName } allowas-in number

where number is the number of instances of your AS in the path you're
willing to accept will correct that.

We believe that the received BGP routes containing local AS# are related
to BGP security problem.

You'll have to elaborate, since their existence is a basic principle in
the operation of bgp and they are ubiquitous.

Island instances of a distributed ASN communicate with each other by
allowing such routes in so that they can be evaluated one the basis of
prefix, specificity, AS path length and so forth.

Hence, we want to look for some real cases in
the wild. Could anybody give us some examples of such routes?

Thanks!

Best Regards!



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: