nanog mailing list archives
Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring
From: William Waites <wwaites () tardis ed ac uk>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:31:19 +0000 (GMT)
On 18 Jan 2015 18:15:09 -0000, "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com> said:
> I expect your users would fire you when they found you'd blocked
> access to Google.
Doesn't goog do certificate pinning anyways, at least in their web
browser?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring, (continued)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Tim Franklin (Jan 20)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring William Herrin (Jan 20)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Ca By (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Ammar Zuberi (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring nanog (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring John Levine (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Ca By (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring John R. Levine (Jan 18)
- Message not available
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Larry Sheldon (Jan 19)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring John Levine (Jan 19)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Ammar Zuberi (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring William Waites (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Kelly Setzer (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Matt Palmer (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Damian Menscher (Jan 19)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Ca By (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Geoffrey Keating (Jan 18)
- Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring Larry Sheldon (Jan 19)