nanog mailing list archives

Re: Brocade MLX Feedback


From: Jeff Sorrels <jlsorrels () kanren net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:17:42 -0600

Graham,

We have several Brocades - including XMR, CER, and CES devices. Their convergence is excellent, even with several full v4 and v6 tables, and was much faster than other platforms (I'm looking at you MXs...). In terms of TCAM and convergence, best bang for the buck as they say.

One 'gotcha' we discovered: Brocade does not have, as per our last discussion with them, BGP FlowSpec on the road map. That was a problem for us, but YMMV.

Cheers,
Jeff



On 1/14/2015 1:10 PM, Graham Johnston wrote:
We are looking at Brocade MLX routers to act as Internet edge routers.  They will initially handle two to four full 
tables, plus peering on an IX.  The price is certainly attractive.  We are coming from Cisco 7600 series devices.  Can 
anyone comment about their use of them?  Are you happy with them?  Any gotchas?  Particularly we are interested in 
convergence time to full FIB population.

Thanks,
Graham Johnston
Network Planner
Westman Communications Group
204.717.2829
johnstong () westmancom com<mailto:johnstong () westmancom com>
P think green; don't print this email.


--
Jeff Sorrels
Network Administrator
KanREN, Inc
jlsorrels () kanren net
785-856-9820, #2


Current thread: