nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:19:23 +0200
On Thursday, January 01, 2015 12:46:23 PM Marcin Kurek wrote:
I am also aware of products like vMX or CSR1000v/XRv and the example given by Saku makes me more interested in licensing/pricing options.
Our network spans Africa, South Asia and Europe. We have 2x RR's in each PoP running Cisco's CSR1000v on x86_64 hardware under VMware ESXi. Pricing is not too bad; we use the Premium license which enables all features (BFD, e.t.c.) that you don't get with the Standard license. Been running this configuration since July 2014 - very happy. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Stephen Lee (Dec 31)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Marcin Kurek (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Tony Varriale (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Baldur Norddahl (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Jeff Tantsura (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mike Hammett (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Ca By (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Nick Hilliard (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Mark Tinka (Jan 02)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Baldur Norddahl (Jan 01)
- Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path? Rob Shakir (Jan 02)