nanog mailing list archives

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:51:29 -0800

Mike, I call bullshit here.

The sales of Apple TV, Google Chromecast, Amazon’s streaming stick, TiVO Stream, and other set-top boxes that stream 
room to room are just too high to believe that people are not using these devices to move A/V information within the 
home. Add to that the number of people who use tablet/cellular capabilities like AirPlay to stream content from their 
phone/tablet to their A/V systems and I think you’re well beyond 5% of the market and growing.

Owen

On Feb 28, 2015, at 07:57 , Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

Over 95% of the people don't do anything of the sort (probably much closer to 100 than 95). The most common usage is 
tablets and phones going to Facebook, YouTube and Netflix. Regular consumers couldn't care less about anything else. 
If you think otherwise, you've (perhaps thankfully) spent too long away from your standard consumer). 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "James R Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:04:56 AM 
Subject: Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] 

On Feb 28, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote: 





Only have a 25 meg Internet service? Use a 5 MHz channel, not 160 MHz. 




So, if I use wireless to my, for example, Apple TV, I should limit the rate between my file server Mac and the Apple 
TV based on my Internet connection speed? 


I’m not certain that is reasonable. 







James R. Cutler 
James.cutler () consultant com 
PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu 




Current thread: