nanog mailing list archives
Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:05:22 +0200
On 12/Feb/15 14:58, Michael Butler wrote:
And to compound the (perceived) problem, any IP embedded in a network design is almost always "prior art". It's not a rabbit-hole worth going down - I agree with Randy,
Agree. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Owen DeLong (Feb 14)
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Jack Bates (Feb 15)
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Message not available
- Re: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Larry Sheldon (Feb 15)
- Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Skeeve Stevens (Feb 12)
- Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Randy Bush (Feb 12)
- Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Michael Butler (Feb 12)
- Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design Randy Bush (Feb 12)