nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:07:18 -0500
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:On Jan 30, 2015, at 18:07 , William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: How about this: when Verizon starts decommissioning its IPv4 infrastructure on the basis that IPv6 is widespread enough to no longer require the expense of dual-stack, IPv6 will have achieved ubiquity.Um, no. The judgment of one traditional telephone company is hardly where I would look to contemplate the future of the internet.
Then AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Level3, etc, could be reasonable examples? I think the general point is worth considering - when v4 gear is regularly being pulled out of commission by large carriers because "who needs it?" and replaced with v6 only gear, we will have achieved true ubiquity. I think you'll see v4 for quite a while. Heck, I still run across SNA, Token Ring, and other really old stuff occasionally... David Barak Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Baldur Norddahl (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion William Herrin (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Tore Anderson (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Baldur Norddahl (Feb 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Tore Anderson (Feb 01)
- RE: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Crawford, Scott (Feb 06)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion David Barak (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion Dustin Melancon (Feb 10)