RE: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion

["Crawford, Scott" <CrawfordS () evangel edu>]

On Jan 30, 2015, at 07:37 , Owen DeLong <owen@delong> wrote:

> /48 for all customer sites is not at all unreasonable and is fully supported by ARIN policy.

> Where Bill is correct is that some customers may have more than one site. The official
> policy definition of a site is a single building or structure, or, in the case of a multi-tenant
> building or structure, a single tenant within that building. Yes, this could technically
> mean that a college dorm contains thousands of sites and could justify thousands of /48s.

Is this your recommendation for colleges? Or, are you simply pointing out a possible interpretation of ARIN policy?