nanog mailing list archives

Re: announcement of freerouter


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:29:08 +0000

Amazing what the proprietary appropriation of a single Word can do :)

 -mel

On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 () gmail com> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

In fairness, when I first looked at the page, I was confused too.


That content of web page(s) must have been altered between when Josh R. and
I viewed it.



It said it ran as a “Router OS Process” which made me think that it was
somehow a virtual router that ran inside the Mikrotik operating system
known as Router SO and I was scratching my head going:

A: How can that possibly work?
B: Why would you want it to?

Now, realizing that the guy probably made an honest mistake without
realizing
he was using someone else’s trade name in the process, it makes much more
sense.

Confusing, but in the end, much ado about nothing[1] all around.


yep
Keeping us on our toes.
:-)



Owen

[1] No intent here to misuse any intellectual property of any Bard or
other person.


On Dec 29, 2015, at 01:08 , Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com> wrote:

It wasn't about trolling, it was about legitimate prior art and
reasonably
so. Also, there's potentially a confusing association between the two.

I'm glad the terminology was removed.
On Dec 28, 2015 2:31 PM, "Laszlo Hanyecz" <laszlo () heliacal net> wrote:

Mike,

Csaba's front page previously described the software as being a
'routerOS', like in the very first sentence on the page.  I'm assuming
that
the person who complained about that didn't read past the first sentence
and just wanted to troll.  It's obvious to me that decades of work have
gone into this free router software, and the term router OS was just
being
used to describe what the software does - an OS for a router.

It looks to me like the author has a deep understanding of networking to
be able to implement all this from scratch and I think we can learn a
lot
from reading this code.  He's also giving it away for free, which is
hard
to argue with.

-Laszlo

On 2015-12-28 18:28, Mike - st257 wrote:

Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:23:24 -0600
From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
To: mate csaba <matecs () niif hu>
Cc: cs () nop hu, NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: announcement of freerouter
Message-ID:
       <CAC6=tfb4=DmpXBgG159NH-p+uTxa+uwf3vOrB=
rsS8T6YQ7Fsg () mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

RouterOS is an existing product by MikroTik.

Mate Csaba's message had nothing to do with MikroTik RouterOS (from
Latvia,
which doesn't include IS-IS support). And Mikrotik RouterOS isn't free.
;-)

Why was this response about RouterOS?  (Am I missing something?)

The posted presentations/slides touch upon the feature set of FreeRtr
(which is similiar to MT RouterOS, but which many production-ready
Network
OSes have).
http://freerouter.nop.hu/present.html
And CLI output examples:
http://freerouter.nop.hu/present.html


On Dec 24, 2015 9:46 PM, "mate csaba" <matecs () niif hu> wrote:

hi,
pleased to announce a stable release of freerouter.

Neat.


this is a routing daemon that does packet handling itself
so it can do bridging, routing ipv4/ipv6 unicast/multicast,
mpls, vpls, evpn, mpls te, mldp, segment routing, and so on...
speaks a lot of routing protocols like rip, ospf, isis, eigrp, bgp,
babel...
does a lot of tunneling like gre, ipip, ipsec, l2tp, geneve, vxlan,
nvgre...
have a lot of built in servers like dns, http(s), smtp, pop3, telnet,
tacacs, radius, ssh...
it can start external images which could be connected, so various lab
topolgies can be easily created.
our nren uses if as primary fullbgp rr for more than a year for about
hundred routers.
here is the homepage: http://freerouter.nop.hu/
feel free to try it out and send suggestions/bug reports...:)
thanks in advance,
csaba mate
niif/hungarnet








-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //


Current thread: