nanog mailing list archives
Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
From: Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:44 -0500
On 2015-12-10 13:07, William Kenny wrote:
"Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up customers' data plans.
In Canada, the Telecom Act 27(2) states: Unjust discrimination (2) No Canadian carrier shall, in relation to the provision of a telecommunications service or the charging of a rate for it, unjustly discriminate or give an undue or unreasonable preference toward any person, including itself, or subject any person to an undue or unreasonable disadvantage. So if this Verizon scheme were to happen in Canada, one could challenge this if the rates charged to Netflix for 1GB of data are different from the rates charged to anyone else, including residential customers as this would be an undue preference. Bell Canada's wireless service lost such a challenge earlier this year because it ended up giving 10 hours of its own TV service for $4.00 while the same 10 hours on competing services would end up costing something like $40 in normal usage charges. (Bell Canada is current at Federal Court seeking the CRTC's decision be invalidated, stating its TV service is "broadcasting" and not subject to the Telecommunications Act despite being delivered over a telecommunications service using IP technology.
Current thread:
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Collin Anderson (Dec 08)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Kenny (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Chris Adams (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Mike Hale (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Hugo Slabbert (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jared Mauch (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? bzs (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? bzs (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Kenny (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Herrin (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Herrin (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Ethan Katz-Bassett (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 11)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Herrin (Dec 11)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 11)