nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:36:35 +0300
My solution is: 1. Don't care. 2. If some peer steal your transit, and it is noticeable amount of traffic causing some problems for you - investigate and terminate that peer. On 18.08.15 15:29, Tim Durack wrote:
Question: What is the preferred practice for separating peering and transit circuits? 1. Terminate peering and transit on separate routers. 2. Terminate peering and transit circuits in separate VRFs. 3. QoS/QPPB ( https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog42/presentations/DavidSmith-PeeringPolicyEnforcement.pdf ) 4. Don't worry about peers stealing transit. 5. What is peering? Your comments are appreciated.
Current thread:
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits, (continued)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits John Osmon (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Bob Evans (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Jon Lewis (Aug 19)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Andy Davidson (Aug 19)